Annotated Bibliography: Death Penalty in Saudi Arabia

Annotated Bibliography: Death Penalty in Saudi Arabia

Name:

Institution:

Annotated Bibliography: Death Penalty in Saudi Arabia

Amnesty International. (2008). Affront to justice: Death penalty in Saudi Arabia. London: Amnesty International.

This conference publication by Amnesty International provides statistical information regarding the incidences of death penalties in Saudi Arabia. The utilization of these statistics provides Amnesty International with a platform for expressing its disagreement with capital punishment. Aside from the provision of such data, the book also examines the legitimacy of the death penalty and the unjust manner in which it is applied as an oppressive tool. This publication by Amnesty International will be effective in my study. The statistics will provide my research with validity and accuracy. Moreover, the book will aid in the institution of different opinions regarding capital punishment in Saudi Arabia.

Bradley. J. R. (2005). Saudi Arabia exposed: Inside a kingdom in crisis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

This book by John R. Bradley examines the pending issues affecting the government of Saudi Arabia. In spite of its prosperity, Bradley takes a hard look at some of the problems occurring in the monarch. Some of the issues that the book focuses range from the suffrage of women to the impact of political animosity on the stability of the kingdom. In relation to the death penalty, Bradley also evaluates the institution of capital punishment as a religious tool for exercising seemingly prejudicial justice. Regarding my research, this book will provide me with considerable information regarding the current issues affecting Saudi Arabia as a monarch-based government. Furthermore, Bradley’s book will assist me in gaining a background of the death penalty, the institution under Islamic law, the extent to which it is applied and the impact it poses on the Saudi people.

Culzac, N. (2014, August 22). Saudi Arabia executes 19 in one half of August in ‘disturbing surge of beheadings’. The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-executes-19-during-half-of-august-in-disturbing-surge-of-beheadings-9686063.html

The newspaper article by Natasha Culzac addresses the issue of capital punishment in Saudi Arabia. Using the illustration of 19 executions, Culzac looks at the manner in which the death penalty has become common especially in this particular country. Nonetheless, the author also provides an objective view on the legal issue by assessing both sides of the argument. In spite of this, the article is a considerable depiction of the extent to which the death penalty is applied in Saudi Arabia irrespective of the absurdity of some crimes. The article is good for my research. This is because of the information it provides concerning the occurrence of the death penalty in the country.

Otto, J. M. (2010). Sharia incorporated: A comparative overview of the legal systems of twelve Muslim countries in past and present. Leiden: Leiden University Press.

In overview, Jan Michiel Otto in this particular book looks at the Sharia law and its influence on national law in most Islamic countries. For Otto, aspects of the legal system in Islamic countries are attributable to the impact that Sharia law imposed. As such, Otto views such legal structure as extensions of Sharia law in the contemporary society. In order to establish his claims pragmatically, Otto assesses 11 countries (with the inclusion of Saudi Arabia) whose legal structures possess strong ties to Sharia law. This book is important for my research based on its rational inclination towards the role that Sharia law assumes in influencing the recurrence of the death penalty in Saudi Arabia and other Islamic-based countries.

Peiffer, E. (2005). The death penalty in traditional Islamic law and as interpreted in Saudi Arabia and Nigeria. William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 11(3), 507-539.

This journal article by Elizabeth Peiffer looks at the death penalty in a more religious context. In this respect, Peiffer assesses capital punishment in an Islamic context by revealing the influence that conservative Islamic regulations have imposed on the furtherance of the death penalty in most Islamic-based states. In addition to this, the article looks at the brutality inscribed in Sharia law and the manner in which it is carried out on a prejudicial level, especially against women. The article will be helpful in my research. This is because of the background information it provides regarding the death penalty in Saudi Arabia. Nonetheless, in spite of its stance against Sharia law, the article is objective based on its historical trace and foundation of capital punishment.